The book is criticized for excessive praise of one author and a lack of balance. It offers interesting insights but falls short in its execution.
The reviewer found the book to be unbalanced, with too much focus on praising one of the authors. They felt that this detracted from the overall quality of the content. Despite this, the book does present some intriguing ideas and perspectives that are worth considering. The reviewer's main issue is with the execution rather than the concepts discussed.
Quick quotes
In my opinion, there are two problems with the book: First, Stephen Dubner comes across as a sycophant.
Way to much of the book is spent praising Levitt.
The book offers some interesting insights but falls short in its execution.