The reviewer criticizes the book for its misleading claims and lack of scientific rigor, particularly regarding the relationship between wheat consumption and obesity. They argue that the author's arguments are flawed and not supported by evidence.
The reviewer expresses strong criticism of Wheat Belly, arguing that the book's claims are not well-supported by scientific evidence. They point out several issues, such as the author's assertion that vegetarians are generally fat, which the reviewer disputes based on personal experience and studies. The reviewer also takes issue with the author's critique of The China Study, arguing that it is based on superficial correlations rather than a deep understanding of the science. Additionally, the reviewer notes that the book promotes a high-protein, low-carb diet, which they view as problematic. Overall, the reviewer suggests that while there may be some valuable information in the book, it is difficult to separate the good from the bad without prior expertise.
Quick quotes
Oh God, do I have to read this? No. I refuse. I don't have time. I'm not angling to be the one to pick through the errors, and write the "definitive refutation.
Gluten intolerance and celiac disease are real, and they may be more widespread than people realize.
He also criticizes "The China Study" based on some inane correlations published on the internet.