The first half of the book is praised for its exploration of identity and values, but the conclusions are found to be unsatisfactory. The book is seen as a valuable contribution to the discussion on identity politics.
The reviewer loved the first half of the book, which traces the evolution of understanding identity and values. They found this part of the book to be insightful and well-researched. However, they did not agree with Fukuyama's takeaways and conclusions. Despite this, they acknowledge that the book is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion about identity politics and its impact on society. The reviewer appreciates the depth of analysis in the first half but feels that the latter part of the book falls short of providing a comprehensive solution to the challenges posed by identity politics.
Quick quotes
I loved the first half of the book tracing the evolution of understanding identity and values, but Fukuyama's takeaways did not sit well with me at all.
The book is a valuable contribution to the discussion on identity politics.
The first half of the book is praised for its exploration of identity and values, but the conclusions are found to be unsatisfactory.