Ripper: The Secret Life of Walter Sickert

Ripper: The Secret Life of Walter Sickert cover
Good Books rating 4.0

Technical:
  • ID: 901
  • Added: 2025-09-21
  • Updated: 2025-09-21
  • Reviews: 2
Reviews
blogs.reading.ac.uk · Unknown · 2025-01-20
intriguing 4.00

The book delves into the controversial theory linking artist Walter Sickert to the Jack the Ripper murders, presenting a compelling narrative that blends art history and true crime. While the evidence is circumstantial, the author's thorough research and engaging writing style make for a fascinating read.

Ripper: The Secret Life of Walter Sickert is a book that will captivate anyone interested in the intersection of art and crime. The author meticulously examines the connections between Sickert's life and the infamous Jack the Ripper murders, presenting a well-researched and thought-provoking argument. Although the evidence is largely circumstantial, the narrative is engaging and well-supported, making it a compelling read for those who enjoy true crime and art history. The book's strength lies in its ability to weave together historical facts and speculative theories, creating a story that is both intriguing and controversial.


Quick quotes

    The author presents a compelling case that is sure to spark debate among historians and true crime enthusiasts.

    The book's detailed research and engaging narrative make it a must-read for those interested in the Jack the Ripper mystery.

    While the evidence is circumstantial, the author's thorough analysis makes for a fascinating exploration of Sickert's life and work.

thebibliophagist.blog · Unknown · 2018-05-01
intriguing 4.00

The book presents a compelling case that Walter Sickert was likely Jack the Ripper, supported by circumstantial evidence and historical analysis. While the repetitive and lengthy explanations can be tedious, the overall argument is intriguing and well-researched.

Patricia Cornwell's 'Ripper: The Secret Life of Walter Sickert' delves into the theory that the artist Walter Sickert was Jack the Ripper. The book is an expanded version of her previous work, with additional evidence and careful wording to avoid outright accusations. The author provides a thorough examination of Sickert's life and connections to the crimes, making a strong case despite the lack of concrete evidence. However, the book's repetitive nature and lengthy explanations on tangential topics can be off-putting. Overall, it's a fascinating read for those interested in the Jack the Ripper mystery, offering a well-supported theory that invites readers to draw their own conclusions.


Quick quotes

    It is highly likely but not for certain.

    There was no concept of DNA evidence in that time period.

    The redundancy was something that I, as a reader, do not enjoy.

Appears in Lists