The reviewer questions the depth of the research, finding the bibliography sparse despite the praise for the book's thoroughness. They suggest the book sensationalizes the crime rather than providing a nuanced analysis.
The reviewer expresses skepticism about the book's research, noting that the bibliography is surprisingly sparse for a work that is often praised for its thoroughness. They argue that the book leans more towards sensationalism, focusing on the shocking details of the crime rather than offering a deeper psychological or sociological analysis. While the writing is engaging, the reviewer feels that it falls short of providing a comprehensive understanding of the case.
Quick quotes
Though he is so often praised for the incredible research he did on this book, when you look into his bibliography it is disturbingly sparse.
The book sensationalizes the crime rather than providing a nuanced analysis.
It falls short of providing a comprehensive understanding of the case.