The reviewer found the book thought-provoking and elegant, even if they weren't entirely convinced by the idea of parallel universes. They appreciated how the book addressed complex philosophical problems with a simple framework. The reviewer also noted that the book's arguments are persuasive and worth considering, even if they don't fully accept them.
The reviewer read this book almost ten years ago and found it challenging but memorable. They appreciated the book's exploration of parallel universes and its implications for our understanding of reality. The reviewer highlighted three key points that stood out to them: Shor's Algorithm, the nature of time, and the nature of probability. They found the book's arguments persuasive and elegant, even if they weren't entirely convinced by the idea of parallel universes. The reviewer also noted that the book's arguments are worth considering, even if they don't fully accept them. They appreciated how the book addressed complex philosophical problems with a simple framework.
Quick quotes
I read this book almost ten years ago and I wasn't ready to perceive it. And yet it stuck with me, a little intellectual thorn in my scientific side... Could it be? Parallel universes? I don't know, man. Sounds pretty fringe, not to mention unfalsifiable. But as a concept, it deserves its due.
What I love about these examples is that they show just how blind we are to our own biases. Something may sound laughably ridiculous, and through a simple chain of logical steps, we realize that not only is the idea perfectly reasonable, but we believed it all along without realizing it.
I can't honestly say that I'm sold on the idea, that this book made me a true believer. What I can say is that I'm totally seduced by the elegance of the frame by which it takes thorny problems and melts them completely away.