How to Cook Everything

How to Cook Everything cover
Good Books rating 4.0
Technical
  • ID: 5827
  • Added: 2025-10-24
  • Updated: 2025-10-24
  • Reviews: 2
Reviews
mostlyfood.co.uk · Unknown · 2025-10-24
brilliant 4.50

The book challenges conventional notions of success, arguing that givers—those who help others without expecting immediate returns—are often the most successful in the long run. It explores the 'Giver Paradox,' where givers are both at the top and bottom of success metrics, and emphasizes the importance of strategic giving to avoid burnout. The book also highlights the power of 'otherish' behavior, balancing concern for others with self-interest, and the effectiveness of 'powerless communication' in influencing others.

This book turns traditional ideas about success on their head. It suggests that the most successful people aren't the ruthless takers we often imagine, but rather the generous givers. The 'Giver Paradox' is a key concept here, showing that givers are overrepresented at both the top and bottom of success metrics. This means that while givers can achieve great success, they also need to be strategic to avoid burnout. The book emphasizes the importance of being 'otherish,' which means balancing concern for others with your own self-interest. It also highlights the power of 'powerless communication,' where genuine curiosity and humility can be more influential than dominance. The book provides a comprehensive study guide to implement these lessons, making it a valuable resource for anyone looking to achieve success in a more sustainable and fulfilling way.


Quick quotes

    The 'Giver Paradox': Givers are overrepresented at both the top and bottom of success metrics.

    Takers may win in the short term, but their reputations suffer in our transparent, interconnected world.

    Successful givers are 'otherish,' balancing concern for others with their own self-interest.

    Influence isn't about dominance; it's about 'powerless communication' and genuine curiosity.

vanillacloudsandlemondrops.blogspot.com · Unknown · 2015-01-20
insightful 3.50

The reviewer found the book insightful and engaging, appreciating its exploration of givers, takers, and matchers, but criticized its lack of consideration for gender differences and its focus on privileged individuals. They liked the parts about volunteering and reciprocity.

The reviewer found the book to be insightful and engaging, particularly in its exploration of the different types of people—givers, takers, and matchers—and how they interact in society. They appreciated the stories and examples provided, which illustrated the benefits of being a giver and the potential pitfalls of being too selfless. However, they criticized the book for not adequately addressing gender differences and for focusing primarily on privileged individuals. The reviewer also found the sections on volunteering and reciprocity to be particularly interesting and useful. Overall, they felt that the book offered valuable insights and would be worth discussing in a book club.


Quick quotes

    The authors divide the world into three types of people, givers, takers, and matchers.

    The book also has some other information which is tangental but fascinating, such as how to keep from getting burned out if you are in a job (such as teaching) which requires you to give and give and give.

    I liked the example of Ken Lay as a successful taker. “When kissing up, takers are often good fakers.