Responsive Fundraising: The Donor-Centric Framework Helping Today’s Leading Nonprofits Grow Giving

Responsive Fundraising: The Donor-Centric Framework Helping Today’s Leading Nonprofits Grow Giving cover
Good Books rating 3.17
Technical
  • ID: 5747
  • Added: 2025-10-24
  • Updated: 2025-10-24
  • Reviews: 3
Reviews
everand.com · Unknown · 2025-10-24
intriguing 3.50

The reviewer found H.P. Lovecraft's descriptive flair impressive, particularly in stories like 'The Rats In The Walls' and 'At The Mountains Of Madness'. They appreciated the literary quality of Lovecraft's work, though they didn't find it particularly scary. The reviewer also noted Lovecraft's themes of the unknown and the Great Old Ones, suggesting a possible anti-religious critique.

The reviewer had been meaning to read H.P. Lovecraft for some time and finally picked up a collection of his stories. They were impressed by Lovecraft's descriptive writing and found certain stories, like 'The Rats In The Walls' and 'At The Mountains Of Madness', particularly captivating. The reviewer noted that while they are not a hardcore horror fan, they appreciated the literary quality of Lovecraft's work. They also discussed Lovecraft's themes of the unknown and the Great Old Ones, suggesting that these themes might be a tongue-in-cheek critique of religion. Overall, the reviewer found the collection enjoyable and thought-provoking, though not particularly scary.


Quick quotes

    Lovecraft’s prose is excellent and evocatively rendered.

    I didn’t think this stuff was that scary, at least, though reading 'The Shadow Over Innsmouth' right before a nap did trigger a doozy of a strange dream.

    Lovecraft’s world is more than large enough to accommodate the Great Old Ones on top of all his other horrors.

nonprofitpro.com · Unknown · 2020-07-20
intriguing 3.50

The reviewer found the book visionary and beautiful but not as impactful as hoped. They appreciated the eerie feel and less-is-more horror approach, highlighting specific stories like 'The Colour of Space' and 'Dunwhich' as favorites. The reviewer also noted the repetitive use of certain adjectives and the extensive myths created by Lovecraft.

The reviewer had high expectations for the book but found it to be visionary and beautiful, though not as visionary or beautiful as they had hoped. They appreciated the eerie feel and the less-is-more horror approach, which they found intriguing, especially in an age where outright gore is often relied upon. Specific stories like 'The Colour of Space' and 'Dunwhich' were highlighted as favorites. The reviewer also noted the repetitive use of certain adjectives, such as 'eldrich' and 'cyclopian,' which started to feel monotonous. Despite this, they found the extensive myths created by Lovecraft to be awesome and wished he had been around longer to continue his work. The reviewer also mentioned that the book's writing, while not exactly 'scary' by current standards, is fantastic and has a tendency to be wordy. They also appreciated the detailed descriptions that could easily be brought to the screen in a movie format.


Quick quotes

    Visionary and beautiful, but quite as visionary or beautiful as I hoped. Also, one can only read so many stories with the same adjectives, (especially "eldrich" and "cyclopian") before one starts to get bored.

    I really loved the eerie feel to the whole collection. And his less-is-more type horror intrigued me especially in an age where outright gore is relied on.

    Though Lovecraft’s writing isn’t exactly ‘scary’ in current times, the writing is fantastic. He has a tendency to re-use adjectives, mostly Cyclopean, foetid and ghastly, which really only started to bug me towards the end.

givingusa.org · Unknown · 2020-04-14
mixed 2.50

The reviewer criticizes this volume of Lovecraft's tales as a cash-grab, recommending a cheaper, more comprehensive collection instead. They appreciate Lovecraft's unsettling stories and unique supernatural storytelling, which they find genuinely frightening and thrilling, but not all of his works are equally compelling.

The reviewer has read this volume of Lovecraft's tales long ago and now prefers a more comprehensive collection. They find this particular edition to be a cash-grab by Library of America, as it contains fewer works than other editions. While they acknowledge Lovecraft's talent in creating unsettling and disturbing stories, they believe that not all of his works are equally compelling. The reviewer appreciates Lovecraft's unique supernatural storytelling, which they find genuinely frightening and thrilling, but they do not find examining his sentences, dialogue, or character choices to be a productive exercise. They recommend checking out other authors like Clark Ashton Smith and Arthur Machen for similar themes and aesthetic appreciation.


Quick quotes

    You can find a cheaper, larger complete tales edition by Chartwell classics. It’s 1112 massive pages compared to the 800 here.

    Like Poe, and Blackwood, Lovecraft is occasionally genuinely frightening.

    Once you have savored the wonder and elegance of his most famous works, check out Clark Ashton Smith, who was a poet through and through and Arthur Machen, who took on the same subjects, but wrote more for aesthetic appreciation.