The review critiques Jordan B. Peterson's '12 Rules for Life' as a banal mishmash of unremarkable observations and right-wing wisdom, questioning how such material became a bestseller. It suggests Peterson's online following and internet celebrity status, rather than his scholarly credentials, drove its success. The review also examines the broader cultural significance of Peterson's appeal, particularly among young men, and critiques his political and psychological arguments as mean-spirited and hypocritical.
The review of Jordan B. Peterson's '12 Rules for Life' is largely critical, describing the book as a collection of sensible but unremarkable observations interwoven with trite Darwinist generalizations and right-wing wisdom. The reviewer questions how such banal material became a bestseller, suggesting that Peterson's vast online following and internet celebrity status, rather than his scholarly credentials, drove its success. The review also delves into the broader cultural significance of Peterson's appeal, particularly among young men, and critiques his political and psychological arguments as mean-spirited and hypocritical. The reviewer points out that Peterson's advice often contradicts the very principles he espouses, such as his advice on standing up to oppression, which mirrors the logic of social justice activism that he criticizes. The review also notes the manipulative use of procreation as a driving force in human behavior, appealing to the insecurities of young men. Overall, the review suggests that Peterson's work resonates with many people, but it is ultimately seen as a therapeutic exercise for the author rather than a substantial contribution to popular psychology.
Quick quotes
The intellectual bar for popular psychology books has always been disarmingly low.
It is an ugly, mean-spirited treatise against human kindness.
The forces of tyranny expand inexorably to fill the space made available for their existence.