The reviewer finds the book top-heavy and lacking in post-storm resolution, but acknowledges the author's skill in storytelling. The narrative is compelling, but some aspects feel incomplete.
hjparks offers a mixed review of Isaac's Storm, noting that the book feels top-heavy and could benefit from more post-storm resolution. They appreciate the author's skill in storytelling and the compelling narrative, but feel that some aspects of the story are left unresolved. The review highlights the tension between the detailed buildup and the perceived lack of depth in the aftermath. While the book is engaging, hjparks finds it somewhat unsatisfying, particularly in its handling of the engineering and recovery efforts post-storm. The overall sentiment is balanced, acknowledging the strengths of the book while also pointing out its shortcomings.
Quick quotes
Eh. This is tough. I think that the author could have done a better job of balancing the buildup with the resolution.
The novel seems so top-heavy. I wanted more post-storm resolution, either in terms of the engineering that went into Galveston.
The narrative is compelling, but some aspects feel incomplete.