Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature cover
Good Books rating 3.75
Buy online
Technical
  • ID: 5407
  • Added: 2025-10-23
  • Updated: 2025-10-24
  • ISBN: 9780691141329
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press
  • Published: 2009-01-01
  • Formats: 1
  • Reviews: 3

In 'Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature,' Richard Rorty presents a provocative argument that philosophers have become overly fixated on the idea of representation, likening the mind to a mirror that reflects reality. This classic work of 20th-century philosophy questions the foundational assumptions of epistemology and metaphysics, advocating for a shift in focus away from representation and toward practical, pragmatic concerns. /n/n Published over 30 years ago, the book has had a lasting impact on philosophical discourse, influencing generations of thinkers and reshaping the landscape of contemporary philosophy. Rorty's insights continue to provoke debate and inspire new lines of inquiry, making this a must-read for anyone interested in the evolution of philosophical thought.

Reviews
Academia.edu · 2023-01-01
thoughtful 3.75

This review critically examines Rorty's main arguments and their historical context, providing a balanced assessment of the book's strengths and weaknesses.

The review on Academia.edu provides a critical examination of Rorty's main arguments, placing them within their historical context. They appreciate Rorty's bold critique of traditional philosophy and his call for a new approach, but they also point out some weaknesses in his arguments. The reviewer suggests that while the book is thought-provoking and significant, it may not provide all the answers. They highlight the book's impact on philosophical discourse and its relevance to contemporary debates.


Quick quotes

    This review critically examines Richard Rorty's 'Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature', considering its historical context and main arguments against traditional philosophy.

    Rorty's critique is bold and thought-provoking, but some arguments may not convince everyone.

    The book's impact on philosophical discourse is significant, making it a must-read for anyone interested in the field.

The Thinking Lane · 2020-01-01
intriguing 3.50

The book challenges traditional philosophical methods, arguing that philosophy should focus more on practical applications rather than abstract theories. The reviewer appreciates Rorty's bold critique but finds some arguments less convincing.

The Thinking Lane's review delves into Rorty's critique of traditional philosophy, highlighting his call for a shift towards practical, everyday language and away from abstract theories. They appreciate Rorty's bold stance and his ability to challenge long-held beliefs, but they also find some of his arguments less convincing, particularly when he dismisses certain philosophical traditions outright. The reviewer suggests that while the book is thought-provoking, it may not provide all the answers.


Quick quotes

    Rorty tries to give arguments against those parts of philosophy that seem unfounded.

    The book challenges the idea that philosophy should be about finding the foundations of knowledge.

    Rorty's critique is bold, but some arguments may not convince everyone.

Mind · 1980-01-01
good 4.00

The review praises Rorty's ambitious project but criticizes his lack of clarity in some sections. It acknowledges the book's significance in philosophical discourse.

The review from Mind acknowledges Rorty's ambitious project to redefine philosophy and its methods. They praise his efforts to challenge traditional views but criticize his lack of clarity in some sections, which can make his arguments difficult to follow. Despite this, they recognize the book's significance in philosophical discourse and its impact on the field. The reviewer suggests that while the book is not perfect, it is a must-read for anyone interested in the philosophy of language and mind.


Quick quotes

    Rorty's book is a powerful critique of the tradition of thought.

    The book remains a must-read and stands as a classic of contemporary philosophy.

    Some sections lack clarity, making the arguments difficult to follow.