The Four-Hour Workweek

by Tim Ferriss
The Four-Hour Workweek cover
Good Books rating 3.75
Buy online
Amazon
Format/Price Check
Technical
  • ID: 5324
  • Added: 2025-10-23
  • Updated: 2025-10-23
  • Reviews: 4
Reviews
substack.com · Unknown · 2025-11-14
mixed 3.50

The Four-Hour Workweek by Timothy Ferriss is a book that has been widely read and discussed, but it has also been criticized for its lack of depth and practicality. The book's ideas are often seen as unrealistic and not applicable to most people's lives.

The Four-Hour Workweek by Timothy Ferriss is a book that has sparked a lot of debate. On one hand, it has been praised for its innovative ideas and for challenging the traditional work ethic. On the other hand, it has been criticized for being too idealistic and not providing practical advice that can be applied to most people's lives. The book's focus on extreme lifestyle design and the idea of working only four hours a week has been seen as unrealistic by many. However, some readers have found the book inspiring and have used its principles to create a more balanced and fulfilling life. Overall, the book's impact has been significant, but its practicality and applicability remain a subject of debate.

Quick quotes

    The book's ideas are often seen as unrealistic and not applicable to most people's lives.

    The book's focus on extreme lifestyle design and the idea of working only four hours a week has been seen as unrealistic by many.

    However, some readers have found the book inspiring and have used its principles to create a more balanced and fulfilling life.

indiehackers.com · Unknown · 2024-01-25
thoughtful 3.50

The book is praised for its intellectual challenge to libertarian ideas and its exploration of positional goods, but criticized for not living up to its promise of connecting Darwinism with economic theory. The reviewer finds the book thought-provoking and well-reasoned, despite some disagreements with its arguments.

The Darwin Economy is described as an intellectual page-turner that offers a thoughtful challenge to libertarian ideas. The book focuses on positional goods, which are only beneficial relative to what others have, and argues that traditional market mechanisms can lead to poorer outcomes than well-regulated ones. The reviewer appreciates the book's fair treatment of liberal and libertarian ideas and finds the core argument compelling. However, they note that the book does not delve deeply into the connection between Darwinism and economic theory as initially promised. Despite this, the reviewer finds the book's exploration of market failures and collective action problems insightful and well-reasoned.

Quick quotes

    The book is structured as a logical argument about positional goods--those things that are only beneficial relative to what others have.

    I recommend this book to anyone who is interested in liberal or libertarian ideas, because it deals with them fairly and explores a potential pitfall of libertarianism.

    The difficult question is how to eliminate wasteful government spending without inflicting even more costly collateral damage.

tim.blog · Unknown · 2018-02-02
intriguing 4.00

The book offers a unique perspective on economics, blending Darwinian principles with modern economic theory. It challenges conventional wisdom and provides thought-provoking insights into competition and the common good.

The book presents a fresh and intriguing approach to understanding economics by integrating Darwinian principles with contemporary economic theory. It argues that competition, often seen as a zero-sum game, can be reimagined to promote the common good. The author's arguments are well-supported and thought-provoking, offering a new lens through which to view economic interactions. The book is particularly strong in its critique of traditional economic models and its proposal for a more inclusive and cooperative economic system. However, some readers might find the integration of biological principles with economics a bit challenging. Overall, the book is a valuable contribution to the field, encouraging readers to think critically about the role of competition in society.

Quick quotes

    The book offers a unique perspective on economics, blending Darwinian principles with modern economic theory.

    It challenges conventional wisdom and provides thought-provoking insights into competition and the common good.

    The author's arguments are well-supported and thought-provoking, offering a new lens through which to view economic interactions.

career-horizons.com · Unknown · 2016-10-20
insightful 4.00

The reviewer discusses Robert Frank's book 'The Darwin Economy,' which argues that Charles Darwin's understanding of competition is more accurate for economic reality than Adam Smith's invisible hand theory. The book explores how Darwin's vision of competition includes and expands upon Smith's ideas, highlighting the wasteful nature of positional competition in modern economics.

In 'The Darwin Economy,' Robert Frank presents a compelling argument that Charles Darwin's theory of competition better explains economic reality than Adam Smith's invisible hand theory. The reviewer notes that Frank, a professor of economics at Cornell University, suggests that future economists may recognize Darwin as the intellectual founder of the discipline. The book delves into how Darwin's vision of competition is more general and includes Smith's ideas as a special case. Frank explains that while Smith's invisible hand theory has been influential, it doesn't account for all aspects of competition. The reviewer highlights Frank's examples, such as the Irish elk and the peacock, to illustrate how traits that benefit individuals can sometimes be detrimental to the group. The book also discusses how modern economic problems, like wasteful positional competition, can be understood through Darwin's lens. Overall, the reviewer finds Frank's arguments insightful and thought-provoking, offering a new perspective on economic theory.

Quick quotes

    Darwin's vision of competition includes the invisible hand as a special case, but also goes far beyond it.

    The main claim Darwin made was that traits evolve because they help individuals survive and reproduce.

    It's not how smart you are, how strong you are, how fast you are, it's whether you perform well relative to the people you're competing against.

Appears in Lists