The reviewer enjoyed MaddAddam and the other two books in the trilogy, finding them intriguing and often great fun. However, they noted that the plot is not particularly original, drawing comparisons to other post-apocalyptic stories and films. The reviewer appreciated the complexity, tough-minded satire, and strangeness of the books, but felt that Atwood did not fully capitalize on the advantages of the science fiction genre.
The reviewer thoroughly enjoyed MaddAddam and the other two books in the trilogy, finding them to be a wild ride with a complex and tough-minded satire. The books are set in a dystopian world that is seen in flashback, and the plot is not particularly original, drawing comparisons to other post-apocalyptic stories and films. The reviewer appreciated the strangeness of the books, but felt that Atwood did not fully capitalize on the advantages of the science fiction genre, such as its ingenuity and fast-moving plots. The reviewer also noted that the books present an eccentric spectacle of a fierce, learned intelligence throwing out references to Robinson Crusoe, Blake, and especially Milton, while writing what is essentially an epic B-movie.
Quick quotes
The dystopian world that existed before the pandemic is seen in flashback: a nightmare of all-controlling corporations, out-of-control scientific innovations, ecological catastrophe and social breakdown which is equally familiar, from the likes of Blade Runner, Minority Report, The Hunger Games and countless others.
It is regarded as a form of bigotry nowadays to disparage SF, but there are clear reasons why many people don't get on with it.
MaddAddam is slightly crazed, usually intriguing and often great fun.