The reviewer found the book challenging and reflective, with moments of brilliance, but ultimately detested it due to poor writing and repellent character choices. The book's literary merit is overshadowed by its flaws and offensive content.
The reviewer attempted to enjoy this book by William Faulkner, drawn in by its setting in New Orleans, but ultimately found it unappealing. The writing style, characterized by wandering sentences and bizarre word usages, did not convey the intended literary merit. Additionally, the book features poorly written characters, including Black characters portrayed as minstrel cliches and a sexual assaulter treated as a lovable scamp. While there were moments of beauty and potential brilliance, these were overshadowed by the book's numerous flaws and offensive content. The reviewer found the overall experience detestable and felt that the cost of these moments outweighed their value.
Quick quotes
Another try at Faulkner; another failure at Faulkner. I chose this one because it was written in New Orleans, at a house I visited. The house was nice, but I detested this.
You get Faulkner's classic wandering sentences and bizarre word usages that I know are meant to show some sort of literary merit, but what do they actually convey?
Scattered in between, there are moments of beauty and maybe brilliance -- but at what cost?