The writing style is criticized for being dry and academic, lacking the vitality and engagement expected from such a compelling subject matter. Despite its scholarly approach, the book falls short of capturing the reader's imagination.
The Occasional Review's critique of Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Black Man focuses on its writing style, which is described as dry and academic. The reviewer finds the prose lacking in vitality and engagement, which is disappointing given the compelling nature of the subject matter. While the book is praised for its scholarly approach, it is criticized for not fully capturing the reader's imagination. The reviewer suggests that the academic tone detracts from the personal narratives, making it less accessible and engaging. However, the book is still seen as a valuable contribution to the discourse on race, albeit one that could have benefited from a more dynamic writing style.
Quick quotes
This is not bad writing, exactly, it is just completely dead. It is Professor Writing.
I recognize it from a thousand mediocre lectures and bad seminars.
The writing style is criticized for being dry and academic, lacking the vitality and engagement expected from such a compelling subject matter.