The essay is praised for its compelling argument against the ideology of eating animals, particularly lobsters. It is considered one of the best pieces of non-fiction on the subject.
Vegan Practically's review focuses on the essay's compelling argument against the ideology of eating animals, particularly lobsters. They highlight how Wallace's writing is both persuasive and thought-provoking, making a strong case for ethical considerations in diet. The reviewer notes that the essay is not just a call to action but also a deeply philosophical exploration of human behavior. They appreciate Wallace's ability to blend personal anecdotes with broader societal critiques, making the essay both relatable and impactful.
Quick quotes
In my view it's one of the best pieces of non-fiction writing to question the ideology of eating animals, in this case lobster, ever written.
Wallace's writing is both persuasive and thought-provoking, making a strong case for ethical considerations in diet.
The essay is not just a call to action but also a deeply philosophical exploration of human behavior.