Generative Syntax: A cross-linguistic approach

by Barrie, M.
Generative Syntax: A cross-linguistic approach cover
Good Books rating 3.33
Technical
  • ID: 3908
  • Added: 2025-10-20
  • Updated: 2025-10-20
  • Reviews: 3
Reviews
Cambridge University Press · M Barrie · 2024-01-01
positive 4.50

The reviewer praises the cross-linguistic discussion in the book, finding it bolstered by comprehensive findings and insightful proposals.

The reviewer appreciates the cross-linguistic approach taken in the book, noting that it provides a robust framework for understanding syntactic patterns. They highlight the author's proposals as particularly insightful, bolstering the findings with a wide range of linguistic data. This makes the book a valuable resource for researchers and students alike, offering a comprehensive view of syntactic theories and their applications across different languages.

Quick quotes

    Like Emonds, Bjorkman provides a cross-linguistic discussion of her proposals to bolster her findings

    She also discusses the have/be

    Like Emonds, Bjorkman provides a cross-linguistic discussion of her proposals to bolster her findings

Reddit - Linguistics · 2020-01-01
critical 2.00

The reviewer criticizes generative syntax for not being cognitively adequate and argues that it fails to model the syntax of natural languages effectively.

The reviewer expresses significant disillusionment with generative syntax, highlighting two main issues. First, they argue that generative syntax lacks cognitive adequacy, meaning it doesn't accurately reflect how the human mind processes language. Second, they contend that it doesn't effectively model the syntax of natural languages, which can be a major drawback for those studying linguistics. This perspective is particularly relevant for those interested in the practical applications of generative syntax in understanding real-world language use.

Quick quotes

    GS isn't cognitively adequate

    generative syntax doesn't model the syntax of natural languages

    I have two main problems with Generative Syntax

DLC - Hypotheses · 2018-09-28
thoughtful 3.50

The reviewer discusses the traditional view of generative syntax as a framework for understanding universal grammar, noting its historical significance and ongoing debates.

The reviewer delves into the historical context of generative syntax, emphasizing its role in exploring universal grammar. They highlight that generative syntax was traditionally seen as a way to uncover the innate principles that underlie all human languages. However, they also acknowledge the ongoing debates and criticisms surrounding this approach, making it a thought-provoking read for those interested in the evolution of linguistic theories.

Quick quotes

    The general view of generative syntax was that it made claims about the innate universal grammar

    by investigating the principles and parameters of generative syntax

    The general view of generative syntax was that it made claims about the innate universal grammar

Appears in Lists