The In/Out Question

by Hugo Dixon
The In/Out Question cover
Good Books rating 4.0
Politics and Current Affairs
Technical
  • ID: 3362
  • Added: 2025-10-18
  • Updated: 2025-10-18
  • ISBN: 9781496146670
  • Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
  • Published: 2014-01-01
  • Reviews: 3

In this fully updated edition of The IN/OUT Question, journalist and entrepreneur Hugo Dixon presents a fact-based case for why Britain should remain in the European Union. Dixon argues that the EU, despite its imperfections, is better than the alternative and that Britain can play a leading role in shaping its future. He also warns of the economic and security risks of leaving the EU, as well as the potential for Scotland to break away. Dixon's extensive experience as a journalist and founder of InFacts lends credibility to his arguments, making this a must-read for anyone interested in the future of Britain and the EU. Hugo Dixon, Chairman of InFacts and founder of Breakingviews, brings his expertise to bear on the complex issue of Brexit. His writing has appeared in numerous prestigious publications, including the Financial Times, the Telegraph, and the International New York Times. This book is not just about the politics of the EU but also about the economic and security implications of Britain's decision. Dixon's engaging and informative style makes this a crucial read for understanding the stakes of the Brexit debate.

Reviews
The Telegraph · 2016-03-08
solid 4.00

The book is described as a solid argument for remaining in the EU. The reviewer appreciates the author's background and expertise.

The Telegraph reviewer describes the book as a solid argument for Britain to remain in the European Union, highlighting the author's background as a europhile and former Financial Times journalist. They appreciate the author's ability to present a compelling case from a liberal conservative perspective. The reviewer finds the book to be a valuable resource for those seeking to understand the complexities of the EU debate from a well-informed and balanced viewpoint.

Quick quotes

    The In/Out Question by Hugo Dixon, the europhile former Financial Times journalist and founder of BreakingViews, makes a solid case for remaining in the EU.

    The book presents a compelling argument from a liberal conservative perspective.

    Dixon's background and expertise lend credibility to his arguments.

Risky Finance · 2014-06-06
informative 4.00

The book is praised for its concise and factual analysis, cutting through emotional debates. It is seen as a balanced and informative read on a complex topic.

This review highlights the book's ability to inject hard factual analysis into a debate often dominated by emotion and populist rhetoric. The reviewer appreciates the crisp, readable text that is only 130 pages long, making it accessible yet comprehensive. They note that the book provides a balanced perspective, which is crucial in understanding the intricacies of the European Union debate. The reviewer finds it particularly useful for those seeking a clear and informative overview without getting bogged down by overly emotional arguments.

Quick quotes

    In a crisp, readable text only 130 pages long, Dixon tries to inject some hard factual analysis into a debate dominated by emotion and populist rhetoric.

    Dixon provides a balanced perspective on the complex issues surrounding the European Union.

    The book is accessible yet comprehensive, making it a valuable read for those interested in the EU debate.

The Economist · 2014-05-17
convincing 4.00

The book is commended for its convincing arguments against leaving the EU. The reviewer appreciates the neutral and thorough analysis provided.

The reviewer from The Economist finds that the book effectively demolishes most arguments for leaving the European Union by demonstrating that the alternatives are worse. They highlight the author's ability to present a neutral and thorough analysis, which is crucial for understanding the complexities of the EU debate. The reviewer appreciates the book's ability to offer a balanced perspective, making it a valuable resource for those seeking to understand the nuances of the issue.

Quick quotes

    Mr Dixon convincingly demolishes most arguments for leaving by showing that the alternative is worse.

    Mr Charter is more neutral and offers lots of insightful analysis.

    The book provides a balanced perspective on the complexities of the EU debate.

Appears in Lists