They argue that while Diamond's work is interesting, it distorts the historical record and oversimplifies complex issues. They find the book to be a disservice to real historical analysis.
The reviewer from Living Anthropologically acknowledges that Jared Diamond's 'Guns, Germs, and Steel' presents interesting points and has contributed to popular discussions on human history. However, they argue that the book oversimplifies complex issues and distorts the historical record. They criticize Diamond's deterministic approach, which they believe ignores the role of human agency and cultural factors. Overall, they find the book to be a flawed but thought-provoking exploration of human history.
Quick quotes
Although Diamond makes interesting points, his work from Guns Germs and Steel to Collapse is a distorting disservice to the real historical record.
Diamond's argument is too deterministic and ignores the role of human agency.
The book oversimplifies complex issues and presents a skewed view of historical events.