The reviewer criticizes the book for having significant blind spots and being overly ambitious, which they argue weakens its scholarly rigor. They find the narrative too good to be true at times.
PopMatters takes a critical stance on 'Defectors,' pointing out what they see as massive blind spots in Ramos' analysis. They argue that the book's ambitious scope leads to a lack of depth in certain areas, making the narrative feel overly simplistic or even 'too good to be true.' The reviewer suggests that while the book raises important questions, it falls short in providing comprehensive and nuanced answers. They believe that a more balanced approach would have strengthened the overall impact of the work.
Quick quotes
Paola Ramos has more than one 'massive blind spot', which makes the ambitious Defectors not scholarly enough and too good to be true.
The book's ambitious scope leads to a lack of depth in certain areas.
While the book raises important questions, it falls short in providing comprehensive and nuanced answers.