Susan Jacoby criticizes the dismissive tone towards Rebecca Newberger Goldstein's work, arguing that her book on Plato is not merely a 'love letter' but a serious philosophical exploration. Another reader finds Anthony Gottlieb's review more focused on his own intellectual prowess than on Goldstein's achievements.
Susan Jacoby takes issue with the review of Rebecca Newberger Goldstein's 'Plato at the Googleplex,' particularly the dismissive tone towards Goldstein's work. She argues that describing Goldstein's book as a 'love letter' to Plato undermines the seriousness of her philosophical exploration. Jacoby also expresses her own frustration with Plato, admitting that Goldstein's lively portrayal of the philosopher has compelled her to revisit his works. Another reader, while acknowledging Gottlieb's intellectual gifts, finds his review more focused on showcasing his own knowledge rather than adequately recognizing Goldstein's accomplishments. They highlight her numerous honors and achievements, suggesting that Gottlieb's review does not do justice to her contributions as a philosopher.
Quick quotes
She regards? If Plato is not generally regarded as the founder of Western philosophy, perhaps there is also some question about whether Jews are regarded as the authors of the Torah.
Unlike my friend Rebecca Goldstein, I have always found Plato tedious, and I am irritated at her for making him sound so lively and alive that I must now struggle out of my cave and reread what I thought I had left behind forever in college.
Who writes love letters? Why, smitten women, of course. (Men write admiring tomes.)