The book was not to the reviewer's taste, finding it to be a load of bat guano. They disagree with the New York Times' praise for its inventiveness.
The reviewer expresses a strong dislike for the book, finding it to be a load of bat guano and not to their taste. They disagree with the New York Times' description of it as the most spectacularly inventive novel, indicating that the book's style and content did not resonate with them. The reviewer's opinion highlights a divergence in critical reception, as they found the book to be unappealing and not worthy of the high praise it has received.
Quick quotes
This is a load of bat guano.
“His most spectacularly inventive novel” according to the New York Times.
This I fear wasn't really to my taste at all.