The reviewer found Calvin's Institutes intellectually stimulating but ultimately preferred a narrative approach to scripture over systematic theology. They appreciated Calvin's insights on faith and prayer but criticized his logical conclusions like double predestination.
The reviewer initially approached Calvin's Institutes with enthusiasm, valuing the systematic theology it presents. However, as they delved deeper, they became disillusioned with systematic theology, finding it arbitrary in its emphasis on certain scriptures over others. They appreciated Calvin's nuanced logic and his inspiring insights on faith and prayer. Yet, they found fault with the logical conclusions of his system, such as double predestination, which they believe narrative theology can rescue. The reviewer now prefers a narrative approach, valuing the unique perspectives of different biblical authors and the overall story of God's relationship with his people. They advocate for letting scripture speak in its diverse glory rather than trying to reconcile every detail into a systematic framework.
Quick quotes
Finishing Calvin’s Institutes felt like eating Bran Flakes. You know it’s supposed to be good for you, but when given the option to have Lucky Charms, you’ll choose the Leprechaun every time.
Systematic theology is like a bit-mapped picture. If you have a sufficiently detailed resolution (or nuanced systematic method), you can reproduce a pretty accurate picture of the original. But why not just enjoy the original?
The Bible is more of a library than a book. Each author has his own understanding of scripture, as inspired by the Spirit of God.