The review discusses the historical plausibility of Cadfael’s detective methods and the social dynamics portrayed in the series, noting some anachronisms and idealizations. It acknowledges the existence of real historical locations and figures, but questions some modern elements in character behavior and clothing.
Dan Goodman raises interesting points about the historical accuracy of Brother Cadfael’s investigative approach, questioning whether his empirical and deductive reasoning fits medieval norms or is more modern. The review also considers the social relationships depicted, such as egalitarian interactions between monks and abbots or men and women, and whether these are realistic for the period or somewhat idealized. The review acknowledges the series’ grounding in real historical places like Shrewsbury and Ramsey Abbeys and notes the accuracy of some names and events. However, there is some criticism of the clothing and certain portrayals that don’t completely align with the mid-12th century setting. Overall, the review balances appreciation for the historical context with thoughtful critique of some liberties taken.
Quick quotes
Would Brother Cadfael's empirical, deductive thinking patterns in his detective work be medieval or modern?
My main problem with Cadfael is the clothing. Most of it is way out for the mid 12th century.
Shrewsbury and Ramsey were both abbeys operational during that period.