The book is seen as an extensively researched but biased and polemical attack on Mao, lacking balance and being a slow, difficult read.
Steve D. Rice acknowledges the vast effort and research behind the book but criticizes it for its obvious bias and inflammatory tone against Mao. He found the book difficult to read due to its density and frequent references to torture and mass deaths, which, while undeniable in Mao's history, are presented without nuance or definitive analysis of Mao's intentions or goals. The reviewer expresses disappointment that the book doesn't provide a balanced view but rather a one-sided condemnation, making it a challenging but informative read for those wanting detailed insight.
Quick quotes
What I got was an obviously biased and quite inflammatory attack on everything (pretty much literally) he ever did.
It is quite a slow read with large numbers of unusual names to remember.
Particularly painful are the elements that talk about torture and the deaths of the Chinese (and others) which is frequent throughout.